Skip to content

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Sep 30, 2020

I think it reads better this way.

I think it reads better this way.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 30, 2020
@camelid camelid added A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically labels Sep 30, 2020
Copy link
Member

@davidtwco davidtwco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, r=me when CI passes

@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ImportResolver<'a, 'b> {
}
_ => {
if !ident.is_path_segment_keyword() {
format!("no `{}` external crate", ident)
format!("no external crate `{}`", ident)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I considered changing it to "no external crate named", but I didn't want to be wordy. What do you think?

Suggested change
format!("no external crate `{}`", ident)
format!("no external crate named `{}`", ident)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that the PR's current wording is fine, but I don't feel strongly - either is an improvement.

@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Sep 30, 2020

@bors r=davidtwco

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2020

@camelid: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Sep 30, 2020

Oh well, worth a try :)

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Oct 1, 2020

@bors r=davidtwco rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

📌 Commit 2c5e2a6 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 1, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 2c5e2a6 with merge 3bbc443...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Approved by: davidtwco
Pushing 3bbc443 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 1, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 3bbc443 into rust-lang:master Oct 1, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Oct 1, 2020
@camelid camelid deleted the improve-wording-crate-resolution-error branch October 1, 2020 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants